Added en-manual for priority score and preferences + website feature text changed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ title: Priority Score System
|
||||
icon: 🎯
|
||||
category: Contest Workflow
|
||||
since: "1.40"
|
||||
summary: Rank active stations from known context such as direction, activity, band, QRG, AP and sked information.
|
||||
description: The Priority Score System combines available contest information to populate a separate list of currently relevant candidates.
|
||||
summary: Rank active base callsigns using known band, direction, activity, AirScout, reply and sked information.
|
||||
description: KST4Contest excludes stations with no known remaining band opportunity and orders the other active candidates using the context already available to the client.
|
||||
tagsList:
|
||||
- ON4KST
|
||||
- VHF
|
||||
@@ -18,12 +18,41 @@ related:
|
||||
- sked-reminder
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why it matters
|
||||
## The problem behind the score
|
||||
|
||||
During active VHF, UHF and microwave contests, relevant stations can disappear quickly in busy ON4KST chat traffic.
|
||||
An ON4KST user list shows who is logged in. During a contest, the more useful question is which station should be examined next.
|
||||
|
||||
The Priority Score System helps operators focus on stations that are more likely to be useful during contest operation.
|
||||
Answering that question manually means repeatedly combining Worked status, possible bands, distance, antenna direction, recent activity, AP opportunities and scheduled contacts. This remains manageable with a short list. It becomes less reliable after several hours of contest operation, especially when multiple bands and chat categories are involved.
|
||||
|
||||
## Built for contest decisions
|
||||
## How candidates are selected
|
||||
|
||||
KST4Contest is not just a chat viewer. It evaluates contest-relevant context and helps turn chat activity into better operating decisions.
|
||||
KST4Contest first checks whether a known common and unworked band opportunity remains. Locally enabled bands, recent QRG detections, band designators in station names, Worked information and manual NOT-QRV marks are evaluated together.
|
||||
|
||||
A known incompatibility or an already completed set of possible bands produces a score of `0` and removes the station from the priority list. Missing band information alone does not. Unknown is not the same as impossible.
|
||||
|
||||
The remaining stations are ranked using several independent hints, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- distance and the configured maximum QRB,
|
||||
- the current antenna direction and beamwidth,
|
||||
- recent chat activity and reaction behaviour,
|
||||
- available AirScout aircraft,
|
||||
- open band opportunities, and
|
||||
- the timing of scheduled contacts.
|
||||
|
||||
An imminent sked receives a deliberately strong boost. Failed attempts and unanswered calls reduce the score.
|
||||
|
||||
## One station, several chat logins
|
||||
|
||||
Suffixes and chat categories remain separate message targets. Worked, band, NOT-QRV and score information is shared through the normalised base callsign.
|
||||
|
||||
This prevents a station using several band-specific logins from occupying several positions in the priority list while still allowing KST4Contest to address the correct complete callsign in the correct category.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## A decision aid, not a propagation forecast
|
||||
|
||||
The score is a relative operating priority. It is not a success probability, a signal estimate or a guarantee that the remote station is ready for a QSO.
|
||||
|
||||
Its value depends on the information available to KST4Contest, and that information may be incomplete, outdated or ambiguous. The final decision remains with the operator.
|
||||
|
||||
[Read the complete calculation and its limitations in the manual.](/manual/en/features/#priority-score-and-priority-list-from-v140)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user